MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913423260 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.024306

<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> transition strength in stable Ni isotopes

2019· article· lv· W2913423260 on OpenAlexafffund
L. J. Evitts, A. B. Garnsworthy, T. Kibédi, J. Smallcombe, M. W. Reed, A. E. Stuchbery, G. J. Lane, T. K. Eriksen, A. Akber, B. Alshahrani, M. de Vries, M. S. M. Gerathy, J. D. Holt, B. Q. Lee, B. P. McCormick, A. J. Mitchell, M. Moukaddam, S. Mukhopadhyay, N. Palalani, T. Palazzo, E. E. Peters, A. P. D. Ramirez, T. G. Tornyi, S. W. Yates

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2019
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersNuclear PhysicsAustralian Research CouncilNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAustralian National UniversityNational Research CouncilTRIUMFNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsSpectroscopyExcited stateInelastic neutron scatteringProtonAtomic physicsInelastic scatteringScatteringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Nuclear physicsChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Excited states in $^{58,60,62}\mathrm{Ni}$ were populated via inelastic proton scattering at the Australian National University as well as via inelastic neutron scattering at the University of Kentucky Accelerator Laboratory. The Super-e electron spectrometer and the CAESAR Compton-suppressed HPGe array were used in complementary experiments to measure conversion coefficients and $\ensuremath{\delta}(E2/M1)$ mixing ratios, respectively, for a number of ${2}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{2}^{+}$ transitions. The data obtained were combined with lifetimes and branching ratios to determine $E0,M1$, and $E2$ transition strengths between ${2}^{+}$ states. The $E0$ transition strengths between ${0}^{+}$ states were measured using internal conversion electron spectroscopy and compare well to previous results from internal pair formation spectroscopy. The $E0$ transition strengths between the lowest-lying ${2}^{+}$ states were found to be consistently large for the isotopes studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207