MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913457409 · doi:10.1016/j.vgie.2018.11.004

EUS biliary drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent through a pre-existing duodenal metal stent

2019· article· en· W2913457409 on OpenAlex
Laurence De Davide, Marc-André Bureau, T Manière, Panagiota Toliopoulos, Étienne Désilets

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVideoGIE · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Canadian institutionsCentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-AppalachesHôpital Charles-Le Moyne
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStentLumen (anatomy)Biliary drainageInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is an alternative procedure to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) after ERCP failure. Success rates with EUS-BD are estimated to be around 95%, depending on the endoscopist’s experience, and a recent meta-analysis has demonstrated that EUS-BD provides equivalent technical success with lower rates of adverse events in comparison with PTBD.1-4 There are limited data on EUS-BD in patients with an indwelling duodenal stent; only a few articles have suggested that EUS-BD is safe and effective in this patient population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it