PARENTAL STYLE AS A PREDICTOR OF ALEXITHYMIA AMONG ADOLESCENCE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study investigated parental style as a predictor of Alexithymia among adolescence using a Parental Authority Questionnaire (PAQ) and Toronto Alexithymia scale (TAS) as measuring instruments. A cross sectional Survey design was adopted using a sample of two hundred (200) adolescents systematically random sampled from St. John’s Secondary School Awka and Comprehensive College Nawfia, Anambra State with their age ranged between 15 – 21 years and average mean ( of 18. Multiple regression analysis (enter method) was used for the data analysis as statistical package. The result showed that authoritative parental style, except for permissive parental style predicted alexithymia among adolescences. The Beta (β) co-efficient for authoritative are DDF = .07, DIF = .02, EOT= 16*, P<.05, permissive DDF = .22*, DIF = .18*, EOT = .12, P<.05, Discussion of the results together with recommendation were made.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".