Distinct Neuroanatomical Structures of Acupoints Kidney 1 to Kidney 8: A Cadaveric Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: The Systematic Classic/Zhen Jiu Jia Yi Jing (ZJJYJ, 鍼灸甲乙經) is considered to be the first complete acupuncture manual to detail the location and meridian assignations of 349 acupuncture points. Despite numerous transcriptions and editing changes, many traditional acupuncturists adhere to the classics and rarely question their validity. However, ushering the use of acupuncture into the modern era requires examining acupuncture point locations objectively by comparing contemporary anatomical knowledge with classical texts. The aim of this research was to examine distinct neuroanatomical targets associated with acupuncture points to: (1) standardize the precise neuroanatomical target of each acupuncture point; and (2) crossreference neuroanatomical targets with classical point locations. This was done to demonstrate ancient authors' intentions when describing acupuncture points as coordinates used to stimulate the peripheral nervous system. Materials and Methods: The unique neuroanatomical targets associated with acupuncture points on the Foot Shao Yin Kidney meridian were defined. Specifically, KI 1 through KI 8 were examined by comparing classical point locations from the ZJJYJ with modern standardized textbook locations from Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion, current anatomical literature, the current authors' cadaver dissection research, and electrostimulation of acupuncture points in healthy volunteers. Results: KI 1–KI 8 correlated with motor entry points as well as with nerve branches and vessels derived from the posterior tibial neurovascular bundle. Conclusions: This research demonstrated a procedure to verify and standardize the distinct neuroanatomical structures of acupuncture points. Standardization of neuroanatomical targets of acupuncture points will enable researchers and clinicians to obtain reproducible results in clinical treatments and research protocols.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".