MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913570088

Foreword for Special Issue: Summertime Ocean and Sea Ice in the Central Arctic

2011· article· en· W2913570088 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhao Jinping

Bibliographic record

VenueADVANCES IN POLAR SCIENCE · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOceanographyArcticCruiseSea iceThe arcticBeaufort seaArctic ice packArctic sea ice declineClimatologyGeologyGeographyDrift ice
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The International Polar Year (IPY) took place in 2007–2008. During the IPY, the China Program for IPY 2007–2008 was launched and, in 2008 and 2010, Arctic cruises were undertaken. The two cruises explored some marginal seas, including the Bering Sea, the Chukchi Sea, and the Beaufort Sea. However, the focus of the cruises was the central Arctic Ocean, particularly the southern and northern sections of the Canada Basin. The R/V XUE LONG icebreaker reached 85°25′N close to 147°W in 2008, and in 2010 reached 88°26′N close to 170°W. During this second cruise, an onboard helicopter reached the North Pole. Multidisciplinary observations included physical, chemical, biological, and geological oceanography, sea ice physics, atmospheric physics, and chemical analysis. Opportunities to study the central Arctic Ocean are limited; therefore, the data collected during these cruises were invaluable for understanding the rapid changes taking place in the central Arctic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0870.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueADVANCES IN POLAR SCIENCESame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207