Lithium Photo‐intercalation of CdS‐Sensitized WO<sub>3</sub> Anode for Energy Storage and Photoelectrochromic Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Integration of solar‐energy harvesting and storage functions has attracted significant research attention, as it holds promise for ultimate development of light‐chargeable devices. In this context, a functional nanocomposite anode that not only permits electrochemical energy storage through Li‐ion photo‐intercalation, but also exhibits potential for photoelectrochromic applications, was investigated. The nanocomposite is made of the Li‐ion intercalation compound WO3, thinly coated with TiO2 and sensitized by the photoactive semiconductor CdS. During light exposure, the photoelectrons from CdS are transported to the WO3/electrolyte interface, where Li‐ion intercalation takes place. Photoelectron transport is facilitated by the interfacial TiO2 layer. The WO3 was shown to be functional in multiple photocharge–discharge cycles, but the CdS suffers from degradation and photocorrosion. Hence, the selection of compatible semiconductors and protective coating strategies should be pursued to overcome these issues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".