Bibliographic record
Abstract
ÉDITORIAL Révolution ou évolution?Le temps passe si vite et si lentement à la fois.Autant la place de l'humain au travail a pris des décennies à se définir, autant elle s'est construite sous de nouvelles formes en modifiant la nature du travail et ses composantes.L'emprise du temps fait son œuvre.Le travail n'a jamais été si complexe en raison de la demande sans cesse grandissante du niveau de compétences requises pour accomplir les obligations professionnelles.La courbe d'imputabilité des travailleurs a progressé au même rythme, bousculant au passage une main-d'œuvre souvent affectée par le stress et la pression afférente.Une relecture de la croisade de l'humain au travail met en relief les entraves à l'obtention d'un point d'équilibre entre la complexité des tâches à effectuer et la performance attendue.Bref, le temps n'a rien arrangé, il a plutôt mis en exergue les reliefs discrets, et souvent épineux, de la relation des travailleurs avec les tissus organisationnels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".