MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913607312 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2019.2895629

Subpixel Mapping Based on Hopfield Neural Network With More Prior Information

2019· article· en· W2913607312 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Aerospace Science Foundation of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSubpixel renderingComputer scienceHyperspectral imagingPixelArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceCover (algebra)Image (mathematics)Land coverPattern recognition (psychology)Path (computing)Image resolutionComputer visionLand use

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subpixel mapping based on the Hopfield neural network (HNN) is a technique to handle mixed pixels for obtaining the spatial distribution information of land cover. However, the original low-resolution remote sensing image may contain some uncertainties, such as the diversity of the land cover classes and the limitation of the resolution of the satellite sensor, the existing HNN is unable to fully utilize the prior information of the original image. In order to resolve this problem, an improved HNN (I-HNN) is proposed in this letter. In the proposed I-HNN, additional prior information of the original image is supplied by adding a new processing path to the existing HNN. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, two experiments are conducted on real hyperspectral images. The obtained results demonstrate that the proposed I-HNN outperforms the existing HNN. Moreover, the I-HNN does not require any auxiliary data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.393
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it