Distributed Cooperative Economic Optimization Strategy of a Regional Energy Network Based on Energy Cell–Tissue Architecture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The conventional centralized control method can effectively solve the influence of system power imbalance on the optimal dispatching of a power network and stabilize the power fluctuation of tie lines when the control precision is relatively high. However, when there are disturbances and uncertainties in the system, the robustness is insufficient. The distributed control method in economic optimization scheduling has the advantages of simple communication and high reliability and is well adapted to the energy dispersion characteristics of a distributed generator within the regional energy network. However, the control accuracy is slightly less than that of the centralized control method, and when the distributed power encounters a random input or exit, the corresponding sparse network matrix needs to be updated every time, complicating the use of this system for economic operation. In addition, when message loss or communication noise occurs in the communication path, the robustness of distributed control is greatly reduced. To address these issues, this paper proposes a novel power allocation framework to solve the economic optimization problem of a regional energy network that requires only local information exchange among neighboring energy cells and tissues. Correspondingly, to meet the supply-demand balance, a distributed cooperative approach based on the equal incremental principle is used to impart decentralized autonomy to the whole system. In addition, the concept of virtual consistency variables is introduced to manage topological change caused by power excursions in the energy cell and to implement plug-and-play capabilities. Relative to the conventional collaborative control method, the case studies demonstrate the scalability, plug-and-play capability, and robustness of decentralized autonomous control strategies in terms of communication delay, communication failure, and message loss, among other aspects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".