The tetratricopeptide-repeat motif is a versatile platform that enables diverse modes of molecular recognition
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: Other designConsensus signal: none
- Genre
- Candidate signal: ReviewConsensus signal: Review
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.991
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 1.000
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
Tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domains and TPR-like domains are widespread across nature. They are involved in varied cellular processes and have been traditionally associated with binding to short linear peptide motifs. However, examples of a much more diverse range of molecular recognition modes are increasing year by year. The Protein Data Bank has an ever-expanding collection of TPR proteins in complex with a myriad of different partners, ranging from short linear peptide motifs to large globular protein domains. In this review, we explore these varied binding modes. Additionally, we hope to highlight an emerging property of this simple, malleable fold-the potential for programmable complexity that can be achieved by acting as a scaffold for multiple binding partners.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Structural Biology
- Topic
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Field
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
- Canadian institutions
- University of Toronto
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilCancer Research UK
- Keywords
- TetratricopeptideMotif (music)Computational biologyStructural motifPeptideBiologyGeneticsBiochemistryPhysicsGene
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes