MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913641563 · doi:10.1177/0142331218823875

Consensus in first-order nonlinear multi-agent systems with state time delays using adaptive fuzzy wavelet networks

2019· article· en· W2913641563 on OpenAlexaff
Mehdi Taheri, Majddedin Najafi, Farid Sheikholeslam, Maryam Zekri

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks Stability and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemBounded functionFuzzy logicAdaptive controlComputer scienceWaveletMulti-agent systemFuzzy control systemLyapunov functionLyapunov stabilityMathematicsStability (learning theory)Mathematical optimizationControl (management)Artificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a consensus problem is addressed for first-order multi-agent systems with unknown nonlinear dynamics under undirected graphs. Adaptive fuzzy wavelet networks are used to design two novel control algorithms for nonlinear systems without delays and nonlinear systems with state time delays. In these algorithms, adaptive fuzzy wavelet networks are employed to compensate for nonlinear dynamics of systems. Using proper Lyapunov functions, adaptive laws are obtained and the uniform ultimately bounded stability of closed-loop systems is proved. In addition, this paper uses Lyapunov–Krasovskii functions to handle unknown time delays. Three simulation examples are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed control schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Institute of Measurement and ControlSame topicNeural Networks Stability and SynchronizationFrench-language works237,207