MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913641563 · doi:10.1177/0142331218823875

Consensus in first-order nonlinear multi-agent systems with state time delays using adaptive fuzzy wavelet networks

2019· article· en· W2913641563 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks Stability and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemBounded functionFuzzy logicAdaptive controlComputer scienceWaveletMulti-agent systemFuzzy control systemLyapunov functionLyapunov stabilityMathematicsStability (learning theory)Mathematical optimizationControl (management)Artificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a consensus problem is addressed for first-order multi-agent systems with unknown nonlinear dynamics under undirected graphs. Adaptive fuzzy wavelet networks are used to design two novel control algorithms for nonlinear systems without delays and nonlinear systems with state time delays. In these algorithms, adaptive fuzzy wavelet networks are employed to compensate for nonlinear dynamics of systems. Using proper Lyapunov functions, adaptive laws are obtained and the uniform ultimately bounded stability of closed-loop systems is proved. In addition, this paper uses Lyapunov–Krasovskii functions to handle unknown time delays. Three simulation examples are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed control schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it