MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913657124 · doi:10.4000/books.psn.7761

La portée du conservatisme américain au Canada

2009· book-chapter· fr· W2913657124 on OpenAlexaffabout
Louis Balthazar

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses Sorbonne Nouvelle eBooks · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsEspace pour la vieUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceEthnologyPort (circuit theory)SociologyEconomic historyGeographyHistoryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadians may have felt recently much less conservative than their neighbours of the South. Contrary to what has been identified in the past by some observers who compared Canada to the United States, Canada has looked more liberal than its neighbour, thanks to its evolution since the 1960’s. This may be true in part but is quite exaggerated. Americans in fact are less conservative than it has been said. Canadians have become more conservative. Life in the suburbs, and now in the exurbs, has fostered conservative attitudes in Canada as well as in the United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses Sorbonne Nouvelle eBooksSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207