MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2913692236 · doi:10.11575/prism/36129

Juvenile specimens of Prosaurolophus maximus (Hadrosauridae, Saurolophinae) from the marine Bearpaw Formation (upper Campanian, Upper Cretaceous) of southern Alberta, Canada reveal ontogenetic change in crest morphology

2019· dissertation· en· W2913692236 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eamon Thomas Drysdale

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCretaceousGeologyOntogenyCrestJuvenilePaleontologyMorphology (biology)OceanographyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three juvenile specimens of Prosaurolophus maximus, represented by both articulated and disarticulated skeletal material, are the smallest known individuals for the taxon. Their cranial anatomy indicates that the diagnostic characters of P. maximus are ontogenetically variable. In the smallest specimen, the crest and deeply-excavated fossa at the caudal margin of the circumnarial depression are poorly-developed or absent. In the larger specimens, the crest approaches the morphology observed in subadult and adult specimens but lacks the robusticity and deep excavation of the circumnarial depression typical of P. maximus. In contrast, the shape of the caudal end of the circumnarial depression is ontogenetically consistent, potentially making it a reliable character for taxonomic identification. Histological sections from the three juvenile specimens and one large individual indicate that the minimum biological age of the known specimens of P. maximus ranges from two to five years. Given that the large P. maximus individual has yet to reach skeletal maturity, the species may reach a maximum body size larger than represented by currently known specimens, perhaps with a skull length approaching the size of Saurolophus angustirostris. The lack of positive allometric growth associated with the P. maximus crest, which undergoes isometric growth from age three onward, differs from that observed in lambeosaurine hadrosaurs suggesting that the crest may not have been the result of sexual selection. However, positive allometric growth of the circumnarial region and the rugosity of the bony crest suggests that soft tissue structures associated with the narial-crest region, rather than the bony crest itself, may have been selected for sexual display in P. maximus. The juvenile specimens were recovered from sediments of the Bearpaw Formation deposited during the Baculites compressus ammonite zone and magnetochrons 33n.3n to 33n.2n. They are stratigraphically younger than P. maximus specimens from the Dinosaur Park Formation, and contemporaneous to 100,000 years younger than specimens from the Two Medicine Formation, extending the taxon’s temporal range. The occurrence of P. maximus in the marine deposits of the Bearpaw Formation and well-drained upland terrestrial deposits of both the Dinosaur Park and Two Medicine formations suggests that this taxon inhabited various palaeoenvironments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)→Same topicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology→French-language works237,207→