MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913749846 · doi:10.1109/giis.2018.8635746

Energy Consumption and Proximity Accuracy of BLE Beacons for Internet of Things Applications

2018· article· en· W2913749846 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Mackey, Petros Spachos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeaconComputer scienceBluetooth Low EnergyScalabilityEnergy consumptionKalman filterReal-time computingBluetoothThe InternetEmbedded systemTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceWirelessEngineeringElectrical engineeringWorld Wide WebDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the Internet of Things (IoT) era, with millions of connected devices to the internet, indoor location services regarding room discovery and resource identification/tracking are among the most popular applications for smart homes and smart buildings. Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) beacons are a promising solution to improve the scalability and accuracy of indoor localization applications. They are low cost, configurable, small transmitters designed to attract attention to a specific location. In this paper, we investigate three popular BLE beacon devices available on the market and compare them in terms of energy consumption and proximity accuracy for indoor localization services. In addition, two state-estimation filters are developed for the Android mobile platform in order to improve the proximity accuracy when using smartphone devices. Specifically, a static Kalman filter and Gaussian filter are implemented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207