La réforme du Code de procédure civile du Québec : une nouvelle culture de l’exécution ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Avec le nouveau Code de procédure civile entré en vigueur le 1er janvier 2016, le législateur québécois entend favoriser l’éclosion d’une nouvelle culture judiciaire dans toute la communauté juridique et dans l’intérêt des justiciables. L’objectif est de mettre en place une procédure moins coûteuse et plus efficace, moins complexe et plus humaine. Concernant l’exécution des jugements, cela se traduit par la responsabilisation des parties, le renforcement du rôle de l’huissier de justice, la modernisation de certaines saisies ou encore la consécration de véritables principes directeurs de l’exécution. Surtout, sur un plan plus théorique, la nouvelle législation favorise, par les nombreux arbitrages qu’elle opère, le renforcement d’une culture de l’exécution hybride et de plus en plus détachée de ses deux modèles historiques traditionnels, français et anglais.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".