MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2913828593 · doi:10.1101/553214

De novo mutations across 1,465 diverse genomes reveal novel mutational insights and reductions in the Amish founder population

2019· preprint· en· W2913828593 on OpenAlexaff
Michael D. Kessler, Douglas P. Loesch, James A. Perry, Nancy L. Heard‐Costa, Brian E. Cade, Heming Wang, Michelle Daya, John Ziniti, Soma Datta, Juan C. Celedón, Manuel E. Soto-Quirós, Lydiana Ávila, Scott T. Weiss, Kathleen C. Barnes, Susan Redline, Ramachandran S. Vasan, Andrew D. Johnson, Rasika A. Mathias, Ryan D. Hernandez, James G. Wilson, Deborah A. Nickerson, Gonçalo R. Abecasis, Sharon R. Browning, Sebastian Zoellner, Jeffrey R. O’Connell, Braxton D. Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneticsBiologyHeritabilityMutation ratePopulationGenetic variationGenomeLoss of heterozygosityFounder effectEvolutionary biologyGeneGenotypeHaplotypeAlleleDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract de novo Mutations (DNMs), or mutations that appear in an individual despite not being seen in their parents, are an important source of genetic variation whose impact is relevant to studies of human evolution, genetics, and disease. Utilizing high-coverage whole genome sequencing data as part of the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) program, we directly estimate and analyze DNM counts, rates, and spectra from 1,465 trios across an array of diverse human populations. Using the resulting call set of 86,865 single nucleotide DNMs, we find a significant positive correlation between local recombination rate and local DNM rate, which together can explain up to 35.5% of the genome-wide variation in population level rare genetic variation from 41K unrelated TOPMed samples. While genome-wide heterozygosity does correlate weakly with DNM count, we do not find significant differences in DNM rate between individuals of European, African, and Latino ancestry, nor across ancestrally distinct segments within admixed individuals. However, interestingly, we do find significantly fewer DNMs in Amish individuals compared with other Europeans, even after accounting for parental age and sequencing center. Specifically, we find significant reductions in the number of T→C mutations in the Amish, which seems to underpin their overall reduction in DNMs. Finally, we calculate near-zero estimates of narrow sense heritability (h 2 ), which suggest that variation in DNM rate is significantly shaped by non-additive genetic effects and/or the environment, and that a less mutagenic environment may be responsible for the reduced DNM rate in the Amish. Significance Here we provide one of the largest and most diverse human de novo mutation (DNM) call sets to date, and use it to quantify the genome-wide relationship between local mutation rate and population-level rare genetic variation. While we demonstrate that the human single nucleotide mutation rate is similar across numerous human ancestries and populations, we also discover a reduced mutation rate in the Amish founder population, which shows that mutation rates can shift rapidly. Finally, we find that variation in mutation rates is not heritable, which suggests that the environment may influence mutation rates more significantly than previously realized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering→French-language works237,207→