MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913840598 · doi:10.7202/1055720ar

Avec qui les enfants vont-ils vivre ? Facteurs associés au partage du temps parental lors d’une séparation1

2019· article· fr· W2913840598 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
David Pelletier, Solène Lardoux, Yentéma Onadja

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de recherche sociologique · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pendant longtemps, la plupart des enfants qui vivaient la séparation de leurs parents allaient habiter avec leur mère. Les parents séparés sont toutefois de plus en plus nombreux à partager les responsabilités parentales de façon plus équitable, notamment par la garde partagée (ou double résidence, ou résidence alternée). Afin d’identifier les caractéristiques des familles qui influencent la manière dont les ex-conjoints partageront le temps parental au moment de la rupture, nous avons eu recours aux données de l’Étude longitudinale sur le développement des enfants du Québec (ÉLDEQ). Dans cette cohorte représentative des enfants nés au Québec en 1997-1998, nous trouvons que l’établissement d’une double résidence pour les enfants est fortement associé à la participation au marché du travail des mères et au niveau de scolarité des pères. Le climat entourant la séparation et le sentiment d’efficacité parentale des pères jouent aussi un rôle important.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de recherche sociologiqueSame topicMigration, Aging, and Tourism StudiesFrench-language works237,207