MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913885853 · doi:10.26443/crae.v46i1.64

The Professional Training of Museum Educators in Canada / La formation professionnelle en éducation muséale au Canada

2019· article· en· W2913885853 on OpenAlex
Richard Lachapelle, Thibault Zimmer, Anita Sinner

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Review of Art Education / Revue canadienne d’éducation artistique · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMuseums and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsProfessionalizationPolitical scienceHumanitiesProfessional developmentSociologyLibrary sciencePedagogyArtSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: A review of museum training programs was undertaken to assess the current state of professional museum education training in Canada. Out of 18 post-secondary museum studies programs, four programs include one museum education course and two programs include two courses. We found no evidence of museum education content in any of the eight Canadian curatorial practice programs. In terms of specialized programs, a Masters of Museum Education program has existed at UBC since 2012. Another Canadian university is currently examining the possibility of setting up a program. We conclude that the offer of professional museum education training in Canada is slowly improving. Keywords: Museum Education; Museum Education Training; Post-secondary Professional Education; Professionalization of Museum Education. [1] This research has been made possible by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.Résumé : Une analyse des différents programmes de formation muséale a été menée pour déterminer l’état actuel de la formation muséale professionnelle au Canada. Quatre des dix-huit programmes d’études muséales postsecondaires proposent un seul cours d’éducation muséale tandis que deux programmes en offrent deux. Nous n’avons trouvé aucune trace de contenu d’éducation muséale parmi les huit programmes canadiens de pratique des conservateurs. En ce qui concerne les programmes spécialisés, l’Université de la Colombie-Britannique propose depuis 2012 un programme de maîtrise en éducation muséale. Une autre université canadienne étudie présentement la possibilité de mettre sur pied un tel programme. Il semblerait donc que la formation professionnelle en éducation muséale offerte gagne lentement du terrain.Mots-clés : éducation muséale, formation à l’éducation muséale, formation professionnelle postsecondaire, professionnalisation de l’éducation muséale.[1]Cette recherche a bénéficié d’une subvention du Conseil de recherches en sciences humains du Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it