Novel Metric Using Laplacian Eigenmaps to Evaluate Ischemic Stress on the Torso Surface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The underlying pathophysiology of myocardial ischemia is incompletely understood, resulting in persistent difficulty of diagnosis. This limited understanding of underlying mechanisms encourages a data driven approach, which seeks to identify patterns in the ECG data that can be linked statistically to disease states. Laplacian Eigen-maps (LE) is a dimensionality reduction method popularized in machine learning that we have shown in large animal experiments to identify underlying ischemic stress both earlier in an ischemic episode, and more robustly, than typical clinical markers. We have now extended this approach to body surface potential mapping (BSPM) recordings acquired during acute, transient ischemia episodes from animal and human PTCA studies. Our previous studies, suggest that the LE approach is sensitive to the spatiotemporal electrocardiographic consequences of ischemia-induced stress within the heart and on the epicardial surface. In this study, we expand this technique to the body surface of animals and humans. Across 10 episodes of induced ischemia in animals and 200 human recordings during PTCA, the LE algorithm was able to detect ischemic events from BSPM as changes in the morphology of the resulting trajectories while maintaining the superior temporal performance the LE-metric has shown previously.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".