MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913962070 · doi:10.4000/coma.3305

Genèse et histoire éditoriale d’un manuscrit inconnu d’Aimé Césaire

2019· article· fr· W2913962070 on OpenAlexaff
Albert James Arnold

Bibliographic record

VenueContinents manuscrits · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le 18 mai 2018, à la bibliothèque Wren de Trinity College à Cambridge, le vernissage de l’exposition « Wifredo Lam : Livres d’artistes » a réservé une heureuse surprise aux spécialistes du poète présents. On a pu lire, sur deux feuilles manuscrites à en-tête de l’Assemblée Nationale, un texte qui commence par « Des pays intenses, où la force créatrice, jamais épuisée… ». De prime abord, on aurait dit un premier état de « Wifredo Lam et les Antilles », que les Cahiers d’art ont publié sous le titre « Wifredo Lam » dans leur numéro double (20-21) au dernier trimestre de 1946. La biobibliographie assurée par K. Véron et T. Hale en 2013 nous confirme cependant qu’il s’agit du manuscrit autographe de la contribution que Césaire avait offerte pour le catalogue de l’œuvre de Lam exposée au Musée des Beaux-Arts de Caracas, au Venezuela, du 8 au 22 mai 1955.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContinents manuscritsSame topicAfrican history and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207