Genèse et histoire éditoriale d’un manuscrit inconnu d’Aimé Césaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le 18 mai 2018, à la bibliothèque Wren de Trinity College à Cambridge, le vernissage de l’exposition « Wifredo Lam : Livres d’artistes » a réservé une heureuse surprise aux spécialistes du poète présents. On a pu lire, sur deux feuilles manuscrites à en-tête de l’Assemblée Nationale, un texte qui commence par « Des pays intenses, où la force créatrice, jamais épuisée… ». De prime abord, on aurait dit un premier état de « Wifredo Lam et les Antilles », que les Cahiers d’art ont publié sous le titre « Wifredo Lam » dans leur numéro double (20-21) au dernier trimestre de 1946. La biobibliographie assurée par K. Véron et T. Hale en 2013 nous confirme cependant qu’il s’agit du manuscrit autographe de la contribution que Césaire avait offerte pour le catalogue de l’œuvre de Lam exposée au Musée des Beaux-Arts de Caracas, au Venezuela, du 8 au 22 mai 1955.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".