Bibliographic record
Abstract
Infrastructure as a topic of research has seen much attention within geographic and \nScience and Technology Studies literature. Frequently, studies of infrastructure explored \nthe implementation of new infrastructures or the effects of infrastructural breakdowns on \nthe relations sustained by these systems carrying the implicit assumption that \ninfrastructures function seamlessly and disruptions constitute aberrations from a working \nnorm. Recent works have problematized this assumption exploring the everyday practices \nof infrastructure’s users and the practices of repair and maintenance which sustain \ninfrastructural systems. This thesis examines breakdown, repair, and maintenance of a \nnew passenger ferry operating in a rural island community off Newfoundland’s north \ncoast. This thesis extends current observations on emerging repair and maintenance \nliterature from the situated activities of maintainers to the decision-making processes \ngoverning repair and maintenance. In doing so, this thesis illustrates how space, \ncommonly held as a neutral surface on which these practices are undertaken, comes to \ninfluence how the passenger ferry is repaired and maintained as well as used by the \nislands’ residents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".