Integrated multi-timescale modeling untangles anthropogenic, environmental, and biological effects on catchability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Catchability plays a central role in fisheries stock assessment. Since catchability often varies with time depending on population density, environmental factors, and anthropogenic effects, assuming constant catchability in population models can lead to biased abundance estimates. Here we present a novel way to simultaneously estimate time-varying catchability and abundance by integrating a short-term (month-based) removal method and a long-term (year-based) age-structured population dynamics model. We applied this approach to commercial fishery data for a Japanese pufferfish (Takifugu rubripes) population and found that the models with time-varying catchability greatly outperformed the models with constant catchability in terms of predictive ability and model consistency. The temporal variation in catchability was parsimoniously predicted by fishing effort and population size, indicating the existence of effort- and density-dependent catchability. Our approach, integrating population dynamics at different timescales, will help avoid inadvertent overexploitation and contribute to sustainable harvesting by enhancing the estimation accuracy of time-varying catchability and abundance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".