Application of structural interpretation and simultaneous inversion to reservoir characterization of the Duvernay Formation, Fox Creek, Alberta, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Simultaneous prestack inversion of multicomponent 3D seismic data integrated with structural interpretation can provide an effective workflow to maximize value for unconventional plays. We outline an integrated workflow for characterizing the Duvernay play in western Canada, an emerging world-class low-permeability unconventional resource fairway. This workflow includes the determination of a time-depth relationship using synthetic seismograms, generation of seismic-derived time- and depth-converted structural maps, and calculation of inversion-based parameters of density and P- and S-wave velocity. The model-based procedure includes poststack (acoustic) inversion, amplitude variation with offset prestack inversion, and joint PP-PS inversion. With these rock properties determined, calculations are made to determine Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, and brittleness. Faults are mapped based on time slices, isochrons, and correlatable vertical displacements of stratigraphic marker reflections. Significant strike-slip movements are identified by lateral displacement on interpreted geologic features, such as channels and reef edges. Seismic-derived attributes, combined with structural mapping, highlight zones that are conducive to hydraulic fracturing as well as areas unfavorable for development. Mapping of structural discontinuities provides a framework for understanding zones of preexisting weakness and induced-seismicity hazards.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".