Abstract WMP14: e-ASPECTS Improves Sensitivity to Early Ischemic Injury on Acute Computed Tomography Scans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score) is a validated scoring system for assessment of early ischemic change (EIC) on CT head scans, which can be used to guide patient management and improve diagnostic accuracy. Detection of EIC can be challenging particularly for less experienced clinicians. e-ASPECTS software uses machine learning algorithms to support physicians in detecting EIC, which can be quantified using the ASPECTS score. Hypothesis: e-ASPECTS shortens time for CT scan assessment and improves agreement with reference standard ASPECTS when compared to blinded assessment. Methods: 26 clinicians (including 11 radiologists, 6 junior and 7 consultant stroke physicians, and 2 non-specialist physicians) independently scored 2560 ASPECTS regions from 64 patients for signs of EIC on non-contrast CT brain scans. These were acquired within 4.5 hours of stroke onset. A familiarization training set of 5 patients was used prior to scoring. Images were randomized to manual or software assistance. After two weeks images were rescored using the alternative method. Scorers were blinded to clinical symptoms. Reference standard scores were defined by an independent neuroradiologist with information on clinical symptoms, access to 24h follow-up, and with CT perfusion or MRI scans when available. Results: Mean NIHSS was 11. Mean time to score scans fell by 34% (45s, 2:12 to 1:27, mm:ss) using e-ASPECTS assistance. Rater agreement with ground truth was greatest in the radiologist cohort, but performance improved across all clinician categories using e-APSECTS assistance (radiology kappa: 0.26 to 0.38). Sensitivity to EIC improved by a factor of two across all clinician groups using e-ASPECTS assistance, and this was most marked for less experienced physicians. Conclusion: In acute ischemic stroke e-ASPECTS assisted analysis increased accuracy and reduced time for detection of EIC. Routine assistance of non-contrast CT interpretation has the potential to reduce treatment times and improve accuracy across clinicians and sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".