Rectangular Waveguide Differential Phase Shifter Based on Horizontal Ferrite Tiles: Accurate Model for Full-Band Operation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phase shifters are one of the most important elements deployed in the antenna feeding structures. They are being used in several antenna systems for various applications. Moreover, they can be used in different microwave devices such as circulators and isolators. Furthermore, they are one of the commonly used components in circularly polarized antenna systems. They can be deployed using different techniques depending on the required electrical specifications and the power handling capability. Phase shifters with horizontal ferrite tiles have a higher power handling capability than the transistor based. Thus, this type of phase shifter was frequently visited in the literature. However, the previously presented models were either inaccurate or had a narrow validity range. Here, mathematical analysis and study have been performed for non-reciprocal differential phase shifters using two horizontal ferrite tiles based on waveguide technology. A new model is proposed along with the transcendental equation for the phase constant. The presented model is validated through comparison with various standard waveguides over the full band operation. Moreover, an experimental validation step is carried out, where the measured results have acceptable values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".