MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2914310378 · doi:10.20429/amtp.2018.38

Toward a better understanding of Organic Products Consumption: The Key Role of Consumers’ Involvement

2018· article· en· W2914310378 on OpenAlexafffund
Nataly Levesque, Frank Pons, Mahshid Omid

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicOrganic Food and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsModerationTheory of planned behaviorConsumption (sociology)MarketingConsumer behaviourOrder (exchange)BusinessStructural equation modelingPsychologySample (material)Inclusion (mineral)Organic productControl (management)Social psychologyEconomicsComputer scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Food consumption is at the base of human needs and represents an important part of our everyday life (Gottschalk & Leistner, 2013). Furthermore, the organic food market is probably the most promising sector of the global food industry (Tarkiainen & Sundqvist, 2009). However, the gap, often mentioned in the literature, between positive attitude towards organic products and actual behavior regarding these products still represents a major issue. Thus, in this paper, we propose to address this issue using an extended version of the Theory of Planned Behavior to explain parts of this gap and to highlight the crucial role played by consumers’ involvement as a moderator of all relationships in this robust model. To this end, a structural equation modeling was performed and the statistical analysis of a sample of 1327 French consumers supports our organic products buying behavior model. Involvement is a moderator, especially for high-involvement consumers. In particular, the results show that the perceived behavioral control doesn’t have a direct effect on consumers’ buying behavior, but the inclusion of the moderating role of involvement impacts positively this relation for low-involvement consumers. This article concludes with several relevant suggestions in order to help managers to address this attitude-behavior gap. For instance, as increasing consumers’ involvement with organic products seems to decrease the gap between intention to buy organic products and the actual behavior, we suggest to promote organic consumption through increasing consumers’ involvement with organic products. A short-term strategy could be to enhance involvement by stressing the personal benefits of organic products, while in long-term involvement, and thus organic consumption, can be promoted by emphasizing social and environmental importance of organic consumption. Additional suggestions to develop future researches in the area are also provided in the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOrganic Food and Agriculture→French-language works237,207→