MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914336080 · doi:10.18494/sam.2019.2109

Slice and Rearrange to Form Quarter-wavelength Plates: Numerical Simulation in One Dimension

2019· article· en· W2914336080 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chih‐Chang Chang, Shin-Ku Lee, Mingtsu Ho, Chenyu Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors and Materials · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicOptical Coatings and Gratings
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Dimension (graph theory)WavelengthWaferOpticsComputer scienceMaterials sciencePhysicsNanotechnologyMathematicsHistoryCombinatoricsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the computational results of numerical simulations for newly proposed structures combining two quarter-wavelength (QW) slabs in one dimension are presented. The new QW plate is composed of alternate layers of two different QW slabs that are made of nonmagnetic dielectric materials A and B, characterized by the dielectric constants rA and rB , which satisfy the relation ( rA ) 2 = rB > 1, in order to minimize the reflection from the structures. Slabs A and B are, in theory, uniformly sliced into N + 1 and N pieces, respectively, or vice versa. They are then respectively rearranged into two different structures, A(BA) N and B(AB) N , which are numerically proved to function as QW plates. Compared with the traditional antireflection coating (ARC) techniques, the newly proposed structures have the advantages that every component of each type of material is identical in thickness and that they are easy to assemble. The idea of the proposed structures is numerically supported by simulation results obtained through the application of the method of characteristics (MOC). The wavelength of interest is set to 550 nm, which corresponds to green light. The numerical results, in both the time and frequency domains, demonstrate that the proposed structures function as antireflective glasses that can be straightforwardly fabricated and used to increase the energy efficiency and reduce the environmental impact of buildings as well as to enhance the performance of some wavelength-sensitive optical sensors. It can also be used as a new coating material for solar panels to single out the specific wavelength of light and hence to protect the solar panel from infrared and ultraviolet radiations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensors and MaterialsSame topicOptical Coatings and GratingsFrench-language works237,207