MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914403114 · doi:10.1177/096369350801700205

Delamination Resistance of Fibre Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Plate Subjected to Out-of-Plane Loading

2008· article· en· W2914403114 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Composites Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialDelamination (geology)Flexural strengthIndentationFibre-reinforced plasticBeam (structure)Structural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Delamination resistance of fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) was characterized directly from plates that were subjected to out-of-plane loading. Plate specimens used in the study were designed to be mainly unidirectional (0°), with a single layer containing fibre in the orthogonal direction (90°) inserted at the mid-thickness. The test set-up followed the description given in ASTM D3763-02, but using indenter of large radius to minimize the indentation damage. The study found that the out-of-plane loading on the top surface generated firstly a flexural splitting crack in the 0° direction from the bottom half of the plate. The splitting crack facilitated the delamination growth, resulting in a peanut-shaped area in the interlaminar region underneath the 90° layer. The delamination resistance was characterized using the rate of energy loss per unit area of delamination growth, of which the value was found to be consistent with that determined previously, using flexural tests on beam-type specimens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it