MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914420896 · doi:10.4000/books.psorbonne.13470

De la voie accusatoire à la voie législative

2003· book-chapter· fr· W2914420896 on OpenAlexaff
Sébastien Hamel

Bibliographic record

VenueÉditions de la Sorbonne eBooks · 2003
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedieval and Early Modern Justice
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La ville, avec ses rues, ses marchands, ses artisans et les rumeurs qui y circulent, serait un milieu bruyant par excellence au Moyen Âge. Saint-Quentin ne faisant pas exception, ses magistrats municipaux ont voulu exercer un certain contrôle, au meilleur de leur capacité, sur le paysage sonore de leur ville, principalement face à la concurrence des autres pouvoirs et aux excès que le bruit pouvait entraîner. Ne pouvant maîtriser la totalité des attitudes bruyantes et dérangeantes, les dirige...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉditions de la Sorbonne eBooksSame topicMedieval and Early Modern JusticeFrench-language works237,207