MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914450719 · doi:10.1180/minmag.2017.081.093

Magnesio-hornblende from Lüderitz, Namibia: mineral description and crystal chemistry

2018· article· en· W2914450719 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMineralogical Magazine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHornblendeElectron microprobeCrystallographyChemistryCrystal structureTriclinic crystal systemMineralogyMineralBar (unit)Analytical Chemistry (journal)QuartzGeologyMaterials scienceMetallurgyBiotite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Magnesio-hornblende (IMA2017-059) has been characterized in a specimen collected in the sand dunes of Lüderitz, Karas Region, Namibia. The empirical formula derived from electron microprobe analysis and single-crystal structure refinement is A (□ 0.73 Na 0.22 K 0.05 ) Σ1.00 B (Ca 1.79 Fe 2+ 0.10 Mg 0.04 Mn 2+ 0.03 Na 0.04 ) Σ2.00 C (Mg 3.48 Fe 2+ 0.97 Al 0.28 Fe 3+ 0.23 Cr 3+ 0.01 Ti 0.03 ) Σ5.00 T (Si 7.18 Al 0.82 ) Σ8.00 O 22 W [(OH) 1.93 F 0.05 Cl 0.02 ] Σ2.00 . Magnesio-hornblende is biaxial (–), with α = 1.640(2), β = 1.654(2), γ = 1.666(2) (measured with gel-filtered Na light, λ = 589.9 nm), 2V (meas.) = 82(1)° and 2V (calc.) = 84.9°. The unit-cell parameters are a = 9.8308(7), b = 18.0659(11), c = 5.2968(4) Å, β = 104.771(6)° and V = 909.64 (11) Å 3 with Z = 2 and space group C 2/ m . The strongest eight reflections in the X-ray powder pattern [ d values (in Å), I , ( hkl )] are: 2.709, 100, (151); 8.412, 74, (110); 3.121, 73, (310); 2.541, 58, ( $\bar{2}$ 02); 3.386, 49, (131); 2.596, 45, (061); 2.338, 41, ( $\bar{3}$ 51); and 2.164, 39, (261).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it