MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914450851 · doi:10.1145/3308897.3308944

Interference Management Schemes for High Spectral Efficiency Satellite Communications

2019· article· en· W2914450851 on OpenAlexaff
Joan Bas, Màrius Caus, André Perez, Reza Soleymani, Nazli Ahmad Khan Beigi

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingle antenna interference cancellationInterference (communication)Computer scienceAsynchronous communicationCommunications satelliteElectronic engineeringSpectral efficiencyAdjacent-channel interferenceChannel (broadcasting)Co-channel interferenceSatelliteWaveformReuseNomaTelecommunicationsComputer networkTelecommunications linkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a short review on the main high spectral efficient systems for multibeam satellite communications. In this regard, we study the use of Multi-User Detectors (MUD) and Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC) applied to aggressive frequency reuse, frequency packing and Non Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA). Furthermore, we have also considered the presence of co-channel interference and spectrum limitations. The experimental validations have been conducted using DVB-S2 waveform. The results point out that the residual co-channel interference reduce the benefits of using frequency packing schemes. Moreover, we investigate the effect of asynchronous reception of data streams in our previously proposed interference management scheme based on cooperative NOMA in multibeam satellite systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation ReviewSame topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207