Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous sommes tous laques. Cette remarque d'mile Poulat 1 renvoie ce qui constitue le fonds commun des socits dmocratiques d'Occident : elles se sont toutes tablies, entre le XVIII e et le x:x e sicles, sur l'assise d'une sparation indite d'avec la normativit religieuse. Jusqu' son entre dans la modernit, l'Occident inscrit le commandement gouvernemental dans la sphre de la transcendance. Institu par. Dieu, le prince reoit mission de transcrire dans le droit positif les prceptes de la loi divine-naturelle. Il s'agit pour lui, qui agit en coopration avec la religion d'tat, de conduire les tres sur le chemin de leur salut. La grande fracture de 1789, en France, abolit cette intelligence des choses. Situant l'origine du pouvoir dans le peuple lui mme, les socits donnent alors la loi une fonction purement immanente, celle d'assurer dsormais la paisible coexistence des autonomies individuelles. Dans ce cadre conu pour rendre possible une pluralit de fi ns lgitimes, la croyance religieuse ne disparat pas. Elle est mme puissamment garantie. On entend simplement qu'elle ne vienne plus dterminer les rgles formelles de la vie en commun >> 2 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".