MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914478987 · doi:10.7202/1055355ar

Interceptions and captures of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Quebec from 2008 to 2018

2018· article· en· W2914478987 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Gérald Chouinard, Mikaël Larose, Jean‐Philippe Légaré, Gaétan Bourgeois, G. Racette, Maryse Barrette

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytoprotection · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHemiptera Insect Studies
Canadian institutionsGDG EnvironnementMinistère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'AlimentationAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaInstitut de Recherche et de Développement en Agroenvironnement
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPentatomidaeNymphBiologyHemipteraOrchardPopulationHeteropteraHabitatPopulation densityEcologyGeographyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), was monitored in southern Quebec through a network of 137 baited pyramid traps deployed in urban and rural habitats between 2014 and 2017. Overall, 73 adults and 9 nymphs were captured. The first capture in rural (an apple orchard) and in urban areas (in Montreal) were observed in 2016. In that same year, 87% of the 54 individuals (adults) caught in Montreal were from a single trap. Similarly in 2017, only two adults were captured in rural habitats and 87% of the 25 captures (16 adults and 9 nymphs) in urban habitats were from the same trap as in 2016. This trap was the only one in which nymphs of various stages were collected, which suggests population establishment in Montreal. Haplotyped specimens from this site (four adults and two nymphs) were all of the H1 haplotype. Over 40 interceptions and sightings by citizens during the period 2008-2018 are also reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytoprotectionSame topicHemiptera Insect StudiesFrench-language works237,207