MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914482006 · doi:10.3138/ecf.31.2.295

Soft Materiality: Dress and Material Fiction in T.S. Surr’s <i>A Winter in London</i>

2019· article· en· W2914482006 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Timothy Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFashion and Cultural Textiles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMateriality (auditing)ClothingArtScholarshipAestheticsArt historyLiteratureHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As against a recent tendency of material culture scholarship to gravitate towards hard objects, I argue for the special significance of the “soft materiality” of dress, as both a category of material life and a dimension of literary fiction. To do so, I explore both the general theoretical background and the specific case of Thomas Skinner Surr’s bestselling novel A Winter in London (1806). Unlike all other kinds of objects in the novel, Surr’s remnant clothing is highly materialized, with a uniquely clear sense of meditation on the different possibilities of transformation and use available via dress. Most pointedly, the novel turns what Surr calls the “wreck of a wardrobe” into a plenitudinous graveyard testifying to the surprisingly resilient life of dress materials. In this way, the text suggests the special significance of a late-eighteenth-century encounter with a newly softened regime of clothing for a much longer epoch of material perception and imagination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.011
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEighteenth-Century FictionSame topicFashion and Cultural TextilesFrench-language works237,207