MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fuzzy Soft-Set Based Approach for Femto-Caching in Wireless Networks

2018· article· en· W2914482263 on OpenAlexaff
Lubna Badri Mohammed, Muhammad Jaseemuddin, Alagan Anpalagan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWireless networkWirelessComputer networkFuzzy logicSet (abstract data type)Fuzzy setFemto-Distributed computingArtificial intelligenceProgramming languageTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5G networks provide an interesting research challenge with the widespread use of Internet and the scale of mobile data traffic that grows explosively. The emerging need to bring data closer to users and minimizing the traffic off the macrocell base station (MBS) introduces the use of small, low power small base stations (SBS) with small cache space (termed femto caches, or more popularly, helpers). Helpers have low rate backhaul but high storage capacity that can be used to cache most popular files. When users request files that do not exist in helpers, then the files will be transmitted from MBS to helpers. The availability of the data in local cache can significantly improve performance since it overcomes the constraints in wireless environment. This leads to improving network throughput and reducing end-toend and backhaul delay. Caching the optimal contents into femto caches proactively depending on the knowledge about files popularity distribution is not enoughthe since Internet users have different context and different preferences. In this paper, we propose an algorithm for proactive caching based on fuzzy softset (FSS) approach for decision making. The algorithm decides which files to cache and where to cache them depending on file popularity distribution, file to user preferences, file clustering, and helpers to connected users clustering. The simulation results show significant overall cache hit rate increase with the increasing number of user requests. The algorithm can effectively improve system performance by reducing the delay for downloading the files and proactively cache those files which will improve user satisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207