Artificial Neural Network for in-Bed Posture Classification Using Bed-Sheet Pressure Sensors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pressure ulcer prevention is a vital procedure for patients undergoing long-term hospitalization. A human body lying posture (HBLP) monitoring system is essential to reschedule posture change for patients. Video surveillance, the conventional method of HBLP monitoring, suffers from various limitations, such as subject's privacy, and field-of-view obstruction. We propose an autonomous method for classifying the four state-of-the-art HBLPs in healthy adults subjects: supine, prone, left and right lateral, with no sensors or cables attached on the body and no constraints imposed on the subject. Experiments have been conducted on 12 healthy adults (age 27.35 ± 5.39 years) using a collection of textile pressure sensors embedded in a cover placed under the bed sheet. Histogram of oriented gradients and local binary patterns were extracted and fed to a supervised artificial neural network classification model. The model was trained based on the scaled conjugate gradient backpropagation. A nested cross validation with an exhaustive outer validation loop was performed to validate the classification's generalization performance. A high testing prediction accuracy of 97.9% with a Cohen's Kappa coefficient of 97.2% has been interestingly obtained. Prone and supine postures were successfully separated in the classification, in contrast to the majority of previous similar works. We found that using the information of body weight distribution along with the shape and edges contributes to a better classification performance and the ability to separate supine and prone postures. The results are satisfactorily promising toward unobtrusively monitoring posture for ulcer prevention. The method can be used in sleep studies, post-surgical procedures, or applications requiring HBLP identification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".