MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914494465 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-110482

Two-Year Safety and Efficacy Outcomes with Fostamatinib in Adult Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): Open-Label Extension to Phase 3 Trial Program

2018· article· en· W2914494465 on OpenAlexaff
Anne‐Marie Duliège, Donald M. Arnold, Ralph V. Boccia, Michael Boxer, Nichola Cooper, Quentin A. Hill, Darla Liles, Michelle Sholzberg, Hany Zayed, Sandra Tong, James B. Bussel

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSykTolerabilityPlaceboInternal medicineImmune thrombocytopeniaPlateletDiscontinuationAdverse effectGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction. The phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled trials of the SYK inhibitor fostamatinib in adult patients with ITP were followed by an open-label extension (OLE) study to examine durability of response to fostamatinib and to allow patients in the placebo group in the phase 3 trials to crossover to fostamatinib. This abstract provides an additional year of data from the OLE study in patients with up to 3 years of fostamatinib treatment. Methods. Patients were adults with persistent or chronic ITP who had failed ≥1 prior therapy and had ≥3 platelet counts below 30,000/μL at screening. Patients initiated fostamatinib treatment at 100mg BID PO and increased to 150 mg BID based on tolerability and if platelets were <50,000/μL after 1 month. A stable platelet response was defined as a platelet count ≥50,000/μL that was maintained during the second 12-week period of fostamatinib treatment. The pre-specified analysis in the OLE study was the achievement and maintenance of a stable platelet response for 12 months. A post-hoc analysis was conducted on overall response, defined as achieving ≥1 platelet count of ≥50,000/µL within 12 weeks of beginning active treatment. All analyses excluded counts within 4 weeks of a rescue therapy. The data cutoff is 8 March 2018. Results. In the OLE study, 123 patients received fostamatinib, including 44 who had received placebo in the phase 3 studies. At baseline, the median age was 52 years (range 20-88), and 7% had persistent ITP (<12 months duration). The median duration of disease was 8.4 years, and the median platelet count was 16,000/μL at the start of treatment. Prior to the phase 3 studies, patients had tried a median of 3 (range 1-13) unique ITP treatments including splenectomy (35%; median 13 years earlier), corticosteroids (95%), immunoglobulins (53%), TPO-RA (47%), immunosuppressants (43%), and rituximab (32%). The median duration of fostamatinib exposure was 8.9 months (range 1.5-41.3). The median treatment compliance was 98%. At the time of analysis, 42 of 123 subjects (34%) continued fostamatinib treatment. Main reasons for discontinuation included lack of a platelet response after Week 12 (36%), study-specific adverse event (AE) (7%), and other AEs (7%). Of 27 patients with a stable response, 21 (78%) have maintained the response at Month 12 of fostamatinib treatment, and 15 (56%) at Month 24. At Month 12, median platelet count for the 49 subjects with data at that time point was 72,000/µL (range: 9000-333,000 µL). For the 32 subjects with data at Month 24, median platelet count was 80,500/µL (range: 7000-315,000/µL). See figure. An overall platelet response was achieved by 57/123 (46%) patients. AEs were reported by 95 (77%) patients and were mild/moderate in 92 (75%). See table. The most common AEs were diarrhea and hypertension, which were manageable with targeted treatment, fostamatinib dose modifications, or treatment withdrawal (5 patients withdrew due to diarrhea and none due to hypertension). Serious adverse events (SAE) were reported in 28 patients (23%), were considered unrelated to fostamatinib in 23 patients (19%) and included bleeding-related SAEs in 11 subjects (9%), thrombocytopenia in 6 subjects (5%), epistaxis in 3 (2%), sepsis in 2 (2%) and transaminases increased in 2 (2%). Adverse events were consistent with those reported during the placebo-controlled trials. Conclusion. In this open-label extension study of the two phase 3, placebo-controlled trials, 56% of subjects with a stable response maintained the response for ≥24 months. No new safety signals have been detected during long-term treatment of ITP with fostamatinib. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Duliege: Rigel: Employment, Equity Ownership. Arnold:UCB: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; UCB: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Boccia:Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Research Funding. Boxer:Rigel: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Speakers Bureau. Cooper:Amgen, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hill:Novartis: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Zayed:Rigel: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tong:Rigel: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bussel:Uptodate: Honoraria; Protalex: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Prophylix: Consultancy, Research Funding; Momenta: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207