MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914499561 · doi:10.1109/tap.2019.2897489

Enhancing Isolation in Dual-Band Meander-Line Multiple Antenna by Employing Split EBG Structure

2019· article· en· W2914499561 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDecoupling (probability)Meander (mathematics)Multi-band deviceAntenna (radio)OpticsPhysicsOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceTelecommunicationsComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A closely located dual-band meander-line antenna array with isolation enhancement by inserting novel split electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) uniplanar structure is proposed. The meander-line antenna is coupled to a parasitic rectangular patch to achieve the dual-band operation. Splits are applied on the surface of an EBG structure to cause decoupling at the first resonant mode and utilizing an EBG structure to decouple at the second resonant mode. The prototype of the proposed structure achieves a dual band of 180 MHz (3.42-3.6 GHz) and 400 MHz (4.7-5.1 GHz). The mutual coupling is significantly reduced by 26 and 44 dB at 3.48 and 4.88 GHz, respectively, compared to the reference antenna. In addition, the structure has high front-to-back ratio radiation characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.807

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it