MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914540519

Prairie Families: Cree-Métis-Saulteux Materialities asIndigenous Feminist Materialist Record of Kinship-Based Selfhood

2018· dissertation· en· W2914540519 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMasters Thesis · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisKinshipIndigenousGenealogyAnthropologySociologyHistoryGeographyGender studiesArchaeologyEthnologyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis was inspired by Tootinaowaziibeeng First Nation’s administrative and patrilineal Anishinabe designation, and its erasure of the mixed Cree, Metis, and Saulteux communities that resulted in its formation. Tootinaowaziibeeng’s designation as an Anishinabe community is resultant of nationalistic historicizing that has created rigid boundaries between Cree, Metis, and Saulteux communities in the present, and an omitting of kinship webs that formed between the aforementioned communities in the nineteenth century. Kinship webs were the most important social and economic unit of plains Cree, Metis, and Salteaux communities throughout the 1800s, when a variety of Indigenous peoples were coming together in southern Manitoba to form singular camps, unified by shared teachings, common economies like the buffalo, and for mutual survivance. Cree-Metis-Saulteaux materialities—such as quillwork and beading on garments—that were made and collected in the Canadian prairies during the 1800s are material records of kinship webs that understood Cree-Metis-Saulteaux kinship as “fluid, flexible, and inclusive,” as Robert Alexander Innes has described. The use of the term materialities herein draws from Kim Tallbear’s research in the field of feminist, new materialisms, which considers the animacy of so-called objects that relate to Indigenous communities. Applying methodologies for decolonial museology, kinship becomes a decolonial tool that animates nineteenth century Cree-Metis-Saulteaux materialities housed in the Thaw Collection at the Fenimore Museum, once enlivened in proto-feminist spaces wherein Cree-Metis-Saulteaux relationalities took form as materialities, asserting a new mixed aesthetics that represented how Cree-Metis-Saulteaux peoples saw themselves. Drawing from the family histories of the author—stories passed on from their feminine relations, kohkoms, aunties, and cousins—and research with materialities in museum archives, this thesis applies Kim Anderson’s concepts around feminist selfhood to better understand Cree-Metis-Saulteaux peoples outside of nationalistic and bureaucratic categorization. Feminine knowledges of matrilineal decent assist in making contemporary assertions of identity grounded in principles of rematriation—Indigenous selfhoods understood through kinship webs and social organization passed on through the knowledge of women’s communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it