Completion Time Minimization in Multi-User Task Scheduling with Heterogeneous Processors and Budget Constraints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study task scheduling and offloading in a cloud computing system with multiple users, where tasks have different processing times, release times, communication times, and weights. Each user may schedule a task locally or offload it to a finite-capacity shared cloud with heterogeneous processors by paying a price for the resource usage. Our work aims at identifying a task scheduling decision that minimizes the weighted sum completion time of all tasks, while satisfying the users' budget constraints. We propose an efficient solution framework for this NP-hard problem. As a first step, we solve an integer-relaxed problem and use a rounding technique to obtain an integer solution that is a constant factor approximation to the minimum weighted sum completion time. This solution violates the budget constraints, but the average budget violation decreases as the number of users increases. Thus, we develop a scalable Single-Task Unload for Budget Resolution (STUBR) algorithm, which resolves budget violations and orders the tasks to reduce the weighted sum completion time. Our trace-driven simulation shows that STUBR exhibits robust performance under practical scenarios and outperforms several alternatives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".