MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2914711715 · doi:10.1161/str.50.suppl_1.wp94

Abstract WP94: Association of Corneal and Retinal Nerves With Cerebral Small Vessel Disease in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

2019· article· en· W2914711715 on OpenAlexaff
Adnan Khan, Saadat Kamran, Naveed Akhtar, Georgios Ponirakis, Ioannis N. Petropoulos, Hamad Muhannadi, Hoda Gad, Nagi E Ahmed, Ashfaq Shuaib, Rayaz A. Malik

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsSpinal Cord Injury Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNerve fiber layerStroke (engine)OphthalmologyCardiologyHyperintensityGanglionInternal medicineRetinalMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) confers an increased risk of stroke, dementia and death. Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) are ophthalmic instruments which can detect neuronal loss non-invasively and may be useful surrogate markers for white matter disease (WMD). Hypothesis: To determine whether corneal and retinal nerve pathology identified using CCM and OCT, respectively, are associated with cerebral SVD in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: 248 patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke underwent CCM to quantify corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD) and OCT to quantify central foveal ganglion cell complex (CF-GCC). SVD was graded in periventricular (PV) and deep white matter (DWM) regions according to the Fazekas scale and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) were quantified. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and multiple regression. Results: DWMSVD and PVSVD were absent (50%,40%) or present with mild (37%,37%), moderate (9%,16%) and severe (4%,7%) severity in patients with acute ischemic stroke. CNFD was significantly lower in patients with mild PVSVD (P=0.02) and severe PVSVD (P=0.004) and DWMSVD (P=0.026) compared to no SVD. CNBD was significantly lower in patients with severe PVSVD (P=0.020) compared to no PVSVD. CF-GCC was significantly lower in patients with moderate PVSVD (P=0.012) and DWMSVD (P=0.044) and severe PVSVD (P=0.012) compared to no SVD. Comparing patients with and without WMH, CF-GCC was significantly lower (P=0.045), but there was no difference for CCM. Multiple regression analysis showed an association between CNFD and PVSVD severity (β= –1.416, P=0.014) and triglyerides (β=1.146, P=0.016). There was no correlation between DWSVD and PVSVD with age, cholestrol, HbA 1c or blood pressure. Conclusions: Corneal confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography allow rapid non-invasive identification of corneal and retinal nerve pathology in patients with moderate and severe SVD. Furthermore, corneal nerve fibre density correlates with the severity of PVSVD and triglycerides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicGlaucoma and retinal disorders→French-language works237,207→