Percepciones sobre embarazo y lactancia materna en adolescentes embarazadas de San Luis Potosí, México
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Describe the perceptions on pregnancy and breastfeeding in pregnant teenagers. Material and Methods: The sample consisted of pregnant teenagers registered in prenatal consultation. Interviews were recorded and transcribed literally, previously authorized informed consent. Results: Fifteen pregnancy women were studied, 86% with first pregnancy, between 15 - 19 years old, coursing the last trimester. Pregnancy became important in street situations and the use of illegal drugs. The perceptions of breastfeeding were based on tradition and gender forms. All teenagers agreed on breastfeeding from two months to two years old. A quarter of the teenagers planned to take care of their children and family, and three quarters went to finish school and start working. Family support had a significant impact on teenagers to face this process. Conclusions: Teenagers identified the practice of breastfeeding as the irreplaceable nourishment in the infant's life, which reflects strengthening of knowledge during the prenatal consultation. Key words: Pregnancy, breastfeeding, teenagers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".