La multiplication et la propriété de distributivité au primaire : une entrée dans la pensée algébrique?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À la suite de plusieurs recherches situées dans le courant de l’ Early Algebra (Jacobs, Franke, Carpenter, Levi et Battey, 2007; Schifter, 1997; Squalli, 2002), ce texte propose d’interroger les potentialités de savoirs à enseigner et enseignés sur la multiplication à l’école primaire convoquant la propriété de distributivité, pour favoriser l’entrée dans une pensée algébrique. À travers une réflexion à caractère épistémologique et didactique, nous cherchons à caractériser les spécificités de ces savoirs en appui sur une étude de manuels et de discours de futurs enseignants de primaire. Il s’agit d’explorer ce qui peut ou pourrait rendre visible, voire généraliser, des connaissances et des savoirs numériques liés à la distributivité en amont de l’introduction du langage algébrique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.028 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".