MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914761967 · doi:10.7202/1055409ar

L’Agenda des femmes des Éditions du Remue-ménage (1978-2017)

2019· article· fr· W2914761967 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Marie-Claude Garneau

Bibliographic record

VenueMémoires du livre · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article examine l’évolution de l’ Agenda des femmes , projet à la fois littéraire et social, mis sur pied en 1978 par les Éditions du Remue-ménage, la seule maison d’édition féministe au Québec. S’appuyant notamment sur les travaux d’Isabelle Boisclair consacrés aux réseaux littéraires féministes, l’auteure brosse un portrait des thèmes abordés et des collaboratrices convoquées au fil des quelque 40 numéros, de manière à mettre en lumière les relations tissées entre ces derniers et la maison d’édition. En parcourant ces petits objets de gestion du temps, l’auteure parvient à cartographier les idées-phares qui traversent autant la maison d’édition que le mouvement féministe québécois.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.112 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMémoires du livreSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207