MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914774901 · doi:10.3138/ctr.177.002

The Most Unwelcoming ‘Outstanding Welcome’: Marginalized Communities and Museums and Contemporary Art Spaces

2019· article· en· W2914774901 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Syrus Marcus Ware

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Education and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacismSociologyThe artsMedia studiesInclusion (mineral)Rhetorical questionWhite (mutation)IndigenousGender studiesCitizenshipEconomic JusticeCriminologyPolitical scienceLawPoliticsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, Syrus Marcus Ware interrogates the rhetorical moves by arts institutions and academic programs that increasingly espouse the language of inclusion and position themselves as welcoming public spaces for marginalized people in Canada, arguing that instead a deep ‘unwelcomeness’ continues to pervade these spaces. Ware recites three different incidents of violence and hostile ignorance: in the university setting, in a supposedly safe housing space for individuals with disabilities, and in a job interview for a large arts institution. Through these three telling anecdotes, Ware confronts the interrelated anti-Black racism, ableism, and transphobia entrenched in Canadian cultural institutions and policing cultures. Ware concludes with a refusal to wait for “the welcome mat” in a society so determined by white supremacist structures, instead calling for the creation of social justice communities for Indigenous resurgence, Black liberation, and self-determination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicArt Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207