MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914786663 · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.12.030

Translating JSON Schema logics into OWL axioms for unified data validation on a digital manufacturing platform

2019· article· en· W2914786663 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Manufacturing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSemantic Web and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsAutodesk (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJSONComputer scienceWeb Ontology LanguageProgramming languageSchema (genetic algorithms)OntologyNotationSoftware engineeringSemantic WebInformation retrievalMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) is a prevalent data format used in cloud-based platforms that support composable digital manufacturing workflows. The current work presents a method to translate the logics found in JSON Schema into OWL axioms, in order to facilitate ontology-based unified data validation with JSON data. The specific contributions of this paper include the demonstration of using a formal ontology for the logic translation and data validation, a technique for disambiguating implicit relations found in JSON Schema as explicit OWL properties, and mapping JSON Schema validation keywords to equivalent OWL expressions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it