Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective : This study was conducted to investigate the effects of home modification and intervention using assistive devices on occupational performance, activities of daily living performance and risk factor at home in people with disabilities.Methods : Eight participants diagnosed with cerebrovascular diseases and physical disabilities due to chronic diseases were included in this study. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure(COPM) was used to identify important daily activities at home and confirm the performance and satisfaction of the activities. The Assessment of Home-based Activities(AHA) was utilized to identifythe importance, difficulty and safety scores of selective activities . The Home Safety Self-Assessment Tool(HSSAT) was used to identify risk factors at home. In order to compare the effects of home modification and intervention using assistive devices on occupational performance, activities of daily living and risk factors at home before and after the intervention, Wilcoxon signed rank test was conducted.Results : The front entrance, living room, bedroom, kitchen and bathroom were selected as important spaces to conduct occupational performance. After the intervention of home modification and assistive devices application, performance and satisfaction significantly increased. There was a significant enhancement in independence and difficulty in the level of activities of daily living at home, and the overall risk factors at home significantly decreased, especially in the bedroom and bathroom.Conclusion : The occupation-based home modification and intervention using assistive devices improved occupational performance of people with disabilities and reduced the risk factors at home. Researchers were capable of providing chances of maintaining independent role and participating in daily lives to people with disabilities. We suggest applying various assesment tools for each individual’s household and expect more occupation-based home modifications to happen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".