MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914839235 · doi:10.1117/12.2509828

Near-field scanning thermoreflectance imaging (NeSTRI) as a nano-optical technique for contactlessly mapping the thermal conductivity of 2D materials at the nanoscale

2019· article· en· W2914839235 on OpenAlexaff
Sina Kazemian, Sabastine Ezugwu, Giovanni Fanchini

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal properties of materials
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceScanning thermal microscopyThermal conductivityNear-field scanning optical microscopeNanoscopic scaleOpticsScanning electron microscopeGrapheneOptoelectronicsOptical microscopeScanning probe microscopyNanotechnologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To date, virtually all techniques used to image the thermal properties of 2D materials and thin films at the nanoscale have required to position the sample in contact with probes that act as undesirable thermal sinks and dramatically affect the measurements. Thermoreflectivity, an optical technique in which thermal transport properties are measured by contactlessly probing the heat-induced changes in reflectivity at the air-sample interface, has been utilized to image and map the thermal conductivity of solids at the macroscopic and microscopic level, but, so far, has been diffraction-limited in its applicability at the nanoscale. In this paper, we show how our group has tackled such an issue by coupling thermoreflectivity mapping with near-field scanning optical microscopy (NSOM) in a pump-probe nano-optical technique [Nanoscale 9 (2017) 4097]. We show that our technique is successful in investigating the local impact on the thermal conductivity of edges and wrinkles of non-ideal domains of 2D materials. Further on, we investigate the thermal properties of a graphene thin film decorated with copper particles and demonstrate that contactless near-field scanning thermoreflectance imaging can map the electron-phonon coupling in graphene-based nanocomposites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicThermal properties of materialsFrench-language works237,207