MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 14096: Ischemic Postconditioning During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Normalizes Mitochondrial Function in a Porcine Model of Prolonged Cardiac Arrest

2015· article· en· W2914843791 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy Matsuura, Adamantios Tsangaris, Jason A. Bartos, Kadambari Chandra Shekar, Matthew D Olson, Jennifer Rees, Scott McKnite, Michael Lick, Qunli Cheng, Robert W. Neumar, Martin Bienengraeber, Tom P. Aufderheide, Matthias L. Riess, Demetris Yannopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsStuart Olson (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiopulmonary resuscitationCardiologyResuscitationInternal medicineClinical deathCardiac function curveAnesthesiaHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Mitochondrial dysfunction is a hallmark of prolonged ischemia, however it’s onset during cardiac arrest (CA) and reperfusion with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has yet to be elucidated. In a porcine model of CA, ischemic postconditioning (IPC) during CPR increased neurologically intact survival. We hypothesized that reperfusion injury, as evidenced by mitochondrial dysfunction, develops during CPR and is rescued with IPC. We investigated the effect of CA, CPR, and IPC on mitochondrial function and viability. Methods: After 15 min of ventricular fibrillation, 30 animals were randomized to no CPR (VF, n=10), active compression decompression + impedance threshold device (ACD-ITD) CPR (Control, n=9), or ACD-ITD CPR + IPC (IPC, n=11). Aortic blood pressure and ECG were continuously recorded. IPC consisted of 3 cycles of 20 sec compression / 20 sec pause for the first 2 min of CPR. Cardiac mitochondria were isolated via differential centrifugation 4 min after initiation of CPR. Additionally, mitochondria were isolated from 6 animals that did not suffer CA (non-ischemic controls). Respiration and calcium retention capacity (CRC) were measured for complex I (pyruvate+malate) and II (succinate+rotenone) substrates. Respiratory control index (RCI) was calculated as the ratio of states 3 to 4 respiration. Data were compared with ANOVA. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Coronary perfusion pressure was similar between groups during CPR. Compared to the non-ischemic group, VF resulted in decreased complex I and II RCI and decreased complex I CRC. Control CPR increased complex I and II RCI compared to VF but did not affect complex I CRC. IPC increased complex I and II RCI and complex I CRC compared to VF and Control to a level comparable with the non-ischemic group. Complex II CRC was unchanged between groups. Conclusion: Complex I and complex II RCI and complex I CRC are diminished during VF. Respiration is partially restored with standard CPR. IPC improved mitochondrial function to non-ischemic values as early as 4 min after initiation of CPR. These improvements were independent of changes in blood pressure, suggesting that initiation of CPR is a source of mitochondrial reperfusion injury and a critical time for intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionFrench-language works237,207