Bibliographic record
Abstract
We are pleased to note the interest that Van Hoovels and colleagues have for our SpACE Capsule study1, and read with interest their investigation of the clinical utility of assaying fecal calprotectin (FC) to assist in the diagnosis of spondyloarthritis (SpA)2. Rheumatologists traditionally proclaim that the extraarticular manifestations of SpA include inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)3. IBD, including Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis, are analogously associated with various extraintestinal manifestations (EIM). The most common EIM is articular involvement, reported in 16–33% of patients with IBD4. Thus, gastroenterologists often decree SpA as an EIM of IBD. Regardless of which side of this “chicken and egg” debate one adheres to, the unifying message is that SpA and IBD often coexist and need to be assessed, because jointly they modify management strategies5,6. FC is established as an excellent biomarker of intestinal inflammation7. Van Hoovels, et al investigated the value of FC in diagnosing … Address correspondence to Dr. E. Seidman. E-mail: ernest.seidman{at}mcgill.ca
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.015 | 0.017 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".